Computer Security
Apr.26, 2011 in
Cross-Site Scripting
Computer Security
A completely up-to-date resource on computer securityAssuming no previous experience in the field of computer security, this must-have book walks you through the many essential aspects of this vast topic, from the newest advances in software and technology to the most recent information on Web applications security. This new edition includes sections on Windows NT, CORBA, and Java and discusses cross-site scripting and JavaScript hacking as well as SQL injection. Serving as a helpful introductio
Price: $ 43.00
More Cross-Site Scripting Products
Incoming search terms:
- tutorial about computer security
- unix exercises
Related posts:
- Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment: 6th International Conference, DIMVA 2009, Milan, Italy, July 9-10, 2009. … Computer Science / Security and Cryptology)
- Detection of Intrusions and Malware, and Vulnerability Assessment: 5th International Conference, DIMVA 2008, Paris, France, July 10-11, 2008, … Computer Science / Security and Cryptology) Reviews
- How could Web application (in)security affect me?
- A Php Security Scare Called Cross-Site Scripting
- Top Current Cyber-Security Threats
April 26th, 2011 at 1:21 pm
A university textbook with limited practical relevance,
First of all, the book’s title is not quite correct. “Some Technical Aspects of Computer Security” would be closer to the truth. It does not cover many important areas of Computer Security, such as IS organization, physical security etc. The book was written based on university lecture notes and it shows. It is quite obvious that Mr. Gollmann has never been in charge of the security of a corporate network (I doubt that he had SEEN one), so his knowledge regarding the real-life issues is rather limited. There are hardly any case studies in the book. Consequently, the usefulness of the book depends on the audience. If you are a university professor, trying to “entertain” your students with theories that they can forget as soon as they graduate, look no further, buy this book NOW. The same thing applies if you are a student wanting to survive such a course. (The back cover of the book quotes someone from Linköping University: “…the book I have been looking for for years”. I can easily believe that.) On the other hand, if you are an IS security expert, a security manager or an auditor, I doubt that you will be fired if you know nothing about, say, the Harrison-Ruzzo-Ullmann Model. However, if your knowledge about security policies is limited to what’s written in the book, you may be in trouble soon. Those topics that are covered are descriptive and not action-oriented. For example, there is ample information about the types of viruses and anti-virus software that exist, but practically nothing about the controls that should be in place to prevent viruses from spreading. Still, I think everyone interested in computer security will find SOME information in the book that they can use some day.
Was this review helpful to you?
|April 26th, 2011 at 1:26 pm
Worst Textbook I’ve Ever Read,
Without doubt, this is the worst textbook I’ve ever had the misfortune to encounter. Even before the actual text starts, there’s a discrepancy which bodes ill. Specifically, the back cover says:
“Written for SELF-STUDY and course use, this book will suit a variety of INTRODUCTORY and more advanced security programs for students of computer science, engineering and related disciplines.”
However, the Preface states:
“This book grew out of my lecture notes for courses taught on a one-year POSTGRADUATE programme on information security.”
The back cover is false and the Preface is much closer to what you can expect in the book: no person at a Computer Science/Computer Security introductory level will be able to get anything out of this book. The reader MUST already be fully knowledgeable about Unix, NT, Multics, and various computer security models and jargon. There’s no way around that. If you don’t meet those requirements, don’t even think about picking up this book.
The biggest problem with the book is that it’s written from the viewpoint of someone talking to a group of people who are already familiar with the subject: the author is merely pointing out things that those already-knowledgeable people should know. Instead of writing to teach people the topic, the author just synthesizes his own knowledge to focus on the subject. Also, he uses words not to explain and enlighten, but to confuse and obfuscate. For instance, his standard writing behavior is to use obscure technical terms well before he defines them. Plus, in general, as the book progresses, the exercises at the end of each chapter have less and less to do with anything discussed in the book and require such a level of expertise in huge swaths of areas that no one could possibly do them. Some specifics:
- The first five chapters are devoted to some of the theoretical underpinnings of the theory of computer security. Unfortunately, the author doesn’t really explain these models. Instead, he assumes intimate knowledge of the models and talks about certain aspects of them. What’s really jarring is that after solely talking about motherhood and apple pie (security wise) in nice, warm, fuzzy terms, he suddenly drops in “equations” from these models without explaining any of the terms or nomenclature (he follows this procedure throughout the book). Usually, after several pages you can find the definitions for what he’s just said. But, unless you’re familiar with what he’s doing, none of this will make sense.
- For icing, in these first five chapters, the author uses virtually NO examples (which, for the most part, continues throughout the book). He’ll mention Multics and some consultant data base as sources, but he never gives concrete examples of what he’s “explaining.” Even worse, with no examples in the text, the author asks the reader to provide examples of what he’s talking about in the exercises. In general, the exercises assume far more knowledge than the author has provided in the text.
- In chapter 6, “Unix Security,” he moves into “examples” of where these models are used. Similarly to earlier chapters, he writes as though his readers are intimately familiar with the subject (Unix, in this case) and that he’s merely pointing out some interesting things. The chapter is filled with Unix commands with no structure to his delivery or explanation of where those commands come from. Plus, when you get to the exercises at the end of the chapter, they’re mostly of the type that require you to SIGN ON TO YOUR UNIX SYSTEM AND DO THINGS! There’s nothing in the preface of this book stating the requirement for being on (and intimately familiar with) a Unix system. Yet, there you are, unable to understand the chapter, and unable to do the exercises.
- Chapter 7, “Windows NT Security,” is almost as bad. For someone with no familiarity with the inner workings of NT, most of the chapter will be meaningless. It’s not quite as bad as Chapter 6 since NT uses a GUI for what he discusses and Unix uses the command line, but it’s still frustrating. Unlike Chapter 6 and Unix, the exercises don’t assume access to an NT machine, although most of them can’t be done with only the information presented in the chapter.
- Chapter 8, “How Things Go Wrong,” is actually somewhat interesting. It suffers from the same assumption that the reader is intimately familiar with the technical jargon of various systems and protocols. But, it actually involves examples. Of course, the exercises at the end of the chapter are undoable since they don’t relate to anything taught in the chapter and are at a highly technically adept level.
I’m running out of space, so I won’t write about the remaining seven chapters except to say that they suffer from the same things related above. I’d also like to include some advice to Florida State University (FSU):…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|April 26th, 2011 at 1:53 pm
Great Survey of the Fundamenal Science of Computer Security,
Dieter Gollmann’s “Computer Security” provides an excellent survey of the fundamental science relating to the book’s title. As stated in the Editorial Review, it is intended as a graduate Computer Science textbook. While this may be true, it is also valuable for anyone tasked with designing security into an application or distributed system.
The book provides a macro-level introduction to the primary subject areas involved in securing operating, network, and database systems, with varying levels of exposure to theoretical foundations, architectural tradeoffs, and practical implementations. These “varying levels” are perhaps the one difficulty I have with the book, because the treatment of some topic left me with an uneven understanding with respect to other important topics. For example:
In PART 1 FUNDAMENTALS, Chapter 3 (Access Control) lays thorough conceptual groundwork for understanding Chapter 4 (Security Models) which covers the theoretical development (Set Theory and Partial Order Relations) of formal Access Control Models.
These subjects are “bread and butter” to operating/database system securdesigners and receive very robust treatment given the overall dimensions of the book. However, other primary security topics (e.g. Cryptography) do not get enough fundamental explanation to leave an uninitiated reader with a sense of understanding. Perhaps, this dilemma is endemic to computer security itself – a paradigm that requires deep multi-disciplinary subject understanding to master. However, “Computer Security” does mitigate this apparent deficiency by providing a comprehensive Bibliography complete with 163 separate entries.
Was this review helpful to you?
|